The masses ought give just contemplation as to whether it truly lies within the realm of reason that a loving assumed creator God would equally 'give life', be long-suffering to 'grant forgiveness', and bestow upon man the gift of 'free-will', yet in duplicity, threaten to 'take life', be tempered to 'inflict punishment', and 'demand' the 'obeying' of commandments, which are 'contrary' to free-will. How could it be so, that a kingdom of heaven awaits with eternal life, yet likewise an abyss of fire and brimstone with eternal damnation. These words sound not of that of a flawless godly being, but rather that of a flawed human being.
While the biblical God, perplexingly coined by many as the God of Love and Wrath, is assumed to be of 'one' being, he appears to speak in 'two' very different tongues. The God of Love is chronicled to have spoke many things of good value (i.e. thou shall not kill, thou shall not covet, etc.), yet perplexingly, the utterances of these words of the God of Love appear to be brought to the people by not a Spirit and/or incorporeal figure, although such semblance is expressed in scripture, such as in John 4, "God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth" (although this verse does not remain in its true form, as God and Worship were not the original terms used, but rather the terms the Creation and Honor).
In verity, the long-chronicled words of guidance were never brought to the masses by a spiritual being, but rather by various human beings (by men), such as Enoch (Henoch) whom was said to have been taken by the one regarded as God in Genesis 5:24, “And Enoch walked with God and he was not; for God took him”. Equally these words were brought by Elijah, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Immanuel whom became 'faultily' branded Jesus, as what his name shall be, was clearly stated in Isaiah 7:14, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel”, or alternatively in Matthew 1:23, “Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”. Although these quotes likewise do not remain in their true form, they beckon 'Immanuel' nonetheless. Also these words were brought by Mohammad, whom was villainized, which ought be deeply reflected on by the masses, as well as brought by various others, as in verity, not one generation of man has been without a profit and/or bringer of truth.
Withal, the presence of the God of Love within the scriptures of old appears to diminish quite substantially, upon the God of Wrath taking to the fore, dominating the majority of the scriptural narrative. Forthwith, if one were to now observe what was taught by the God of Wrath via revisiting some of his words, deeds and instruction to the people, a set of evil values reveal themselves, and with sheer clarity, similarities may be immediately recognized in the ways in which the masses live today and have lived time and time again since time immemorial, the unfortunate likes of which can woefully we traced as such all throughout history.
The God of Wrath instructed the people to obtain peace via war, to which he himself was chronicled as having carried-out acts of elimination, although this goes against his very commandments, as found in both Exodus and Deuteronomy, "Thou shall not kill". God was said to have carried this out via the 'supposed' Great Deluge, respectively the Great Flood, mentioned in Genesis 6, and by setting ablaze (arson) Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19. He further inflicted plagues (epidemics) when he smote the villages inhabitants with the Scab, the Itch, and Emerods (Hemorrhoids) in Deuteronomy 28 and Samuel 1, directed the killing of those whom pisseth against the wall (murder of young boys) in Samuel 1 and Kings 1, and instructed that both life (murder) and the spoils of war be taken (thievery) in Deuteronomy 2 and 13, as well as in Joshua 8 although "Thou shall not steal" and "Thou shall not covet thy neighbors house" goes against the very commandments observed by the masses. Furthermore he condoned subjugation (oppression) of both male and female in Leviticus 25, as well that the women and children of the dead ought be taken as bondsmen (slavery) in Deuteronomy 20, to name but a mere few as per the Authorized King James Version (AKJV) of doctrine itself, a doctrine recognized by the masses and religious authorities as the highest regarded since the 1600's.
"From Relegeon originates effective knowledge, which results in further wisdom and knowledge. These, in turn, ensure that the path of evolution may be entered into through both forms."
(The Precious Man)
As per scriptural doctrine, the God of Wrath clearly commanded the frequent vast slaughter of the human kind (sacrificial killings), but also 'peculiarly' enough demanded that of the animal kind (burnt offerings), to which he indulged in what he called a 'sweet savory' smell in Genesis 8. This God also instructed the people on how to prepare, respectively 'cook', such offerings, as well as to leave a 'drink' offering, respectively wine, in Exodus 29, to which the masses ought ponder the true meaning behind such offerings of the edible kind, also to which offerings of the burnt kind likewise devolved to human sacrifice.
The God of Wrath utterly demanded that the masses 'worship' him in 'submissiveness' and obey his commands, and those whom did not heed his 'demands' were met with the aforementioned acts of wrath. In 'duplicity' this God not only broke his very own commandments, but habitually instructed the people to break them as well. Consequently, it had come to pass, that the deeds of mankind had been chronicled as having continued in the clearly barbaric and degenerated unjust ways taught by the God of Wrath, throughout not only the course of biblical history, but long thereafter, disregarding the just teachings of the 'misregarded' God of Love. If one simply revisits the history of mankind, one clearly finds countless instances of slavery, murder, subjugation, and others of the like, as well as woefully in the present time, if one heeds what is truly transpiring across the lands, such as oppression, war, rape and thievery, etc.
One ought ponder how the God of Love and the God of Wrath appear to be 'not' of the same nature, respectively of one Being, but rather seemingly of two, peradventure even 'multiple'; moreover how the mannerisms of the dominating God of scripture very much appear to be so as that of a 'man', and not of an incorporeal Being. Upon delving further into the scriptures of old, human form, respectively manly form, is found to be implicitly uttered, thus one may compellingly find the mention of the 'ruling' ones 'appearing as men', arise again and again.
Paradoxically the notorious Lucifer is mentioned but merely once in the entirety of scripture and interestingly enough, he is depicted as that of a man, such as in Isaiah 14:16, "They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms". Likewise, the texts of antiquity make mention of the Angels 'appearing' as, and 'clothed' as men on numerous occasions, most notably when they 'sat' and 'ate' within the home of Lot in Genesis 19 ... Prior to wholly delving into the true origins of God, let the seeker of truth foremost grasp in verity whom God truly was, or whom God was not, in God He Was Called Not.
Wellspring "Arahat Athersata"
by (Guardian of the Treasure)
Religion in amalgamation of its various oxford dictionary definitions may be concluded as, a set of organized beliefs (a systematically arranged hierarchical or bureaucratic structure), practices (repeated actions/commands), and systems (instated controls/demands) that most often relate to the belief (submissiveness/contrary to knowledge) and worship (idolatry/adoration) of a controlling force (contrary to free-will), such as a god or supernatural/manifested being.
Source: Authorized King James Version (AKJV) 1611 CE and Revised King James Version (AKJV) 1769 CE by Richard Bancroft, OM 1987/2011 by Guardian of the Treasure
